Current:Home > StocksTrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Center-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio's sentencing delayed in seditious conspiracy case -Keystone Growth Academy
TrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Center-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio's sentencing delayed in seditious conspiracy case
Burley Garcia View
Date:2025-04-07 20:31:15
Washington — Former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio's sentencing hearing,TrendPulse Quantitative Think Tank Center which had been scheduled for Wednesday, has been delayed due to the judge being out sick, a U.S. Marshals Service spokesperson said. The court says his sentencing has been rescheduled for Tuesday, Sept. 5. Tarrio is to be sentenced for numerous felony counts tied to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol assault including seditious conspiracy.
Tarrio and three subordinates — Joseph Biggs, Ethan Nordean and Zachary Rehl — were found guilty in May of seditious conspiracy, the most serious charge brought in the Justice Department's sprawling probe of the breach. A jury in Washington, D.C., found another co-defendant, Dominic Pezzola, not guilty of that most severe charge, but convicted him on other counts. Nordean, who was also supposed to be sentenced Wednesday, will be sentenced Friday.
Prosecutors have asked federal Judge Timothy Kelly to send Tarrio and Biggs to prison for 33 years — the longest sentencing request so far — and alleged they "and the men they recruited and led participated in every consequential breach at the Capitol on January 6."
In court filings earlier this month, the Justice Department alleged Tarrio and his co-defendants worked to bring about a "revolution" and argued they should be punished accordingly.
"The defendants personally deployed force against the government on January 6," prosecutors wrote, urging Kelly to apply an enhanced sentence, based on allegations that the Proud Boys engaged in conduct related to terrorism — that is, they were found guilty of retaliating against their government.
Although Tarrio wasn't at the Capitol on Jan. 6, prosecutors in their sentencing papers called him the "primary organizer" of the conspiracy and said he used his outsized influence "to condone and promote violence" in others. "He was a general rather than a soldier."
But Tarrio's attorneys pushed back in a sentencing filing of their own, calling the Justice Department's terrorism recommendation "arbitrary" and unnecessary.
"Participating in a plan for the Proud Boys to protest on January 6 is not the same as directing others on the ground to storm the Capitol by any means necessary. In fact, Tarrio was not in contact with anyone during the event he is alleged to have led or organized," the defense attorneys argued.
During a months-long hearing earlier this year, prosecutors presented evidence that soon after the election, Tarrio began posting on social media and in message groups about a "civil war," later threatening, "No Trump…No peace. No Quarter."
"Let's bring this new year in with one word in mind: revolt," he wrote on Jan. 6, 2021, according to the government's evidence.
Nordean, Rehl, Biggs and Pezzola gathered with over 100 Proud Boys near the Washington Monument on Jan. 6, 2021, around the time that President Donald Trump was speaking at the White House Ellipse, and the government contends they then marched to the Capitol, where they were accused of participating in and encouraging the violence.
"Make no mistake, we did this," Tarrio wrote on social media during the riot.
"Did Enrique Tarrio make comments that were egregious? Absolutely," Tarrio's defense attorney asked the jury in closing arguments. "You may not like what he said, but it is First Amendment-protected speech."
But the jurors were unconvinced and convicted Tarrio of seditious conspiracy and other crimes.
Tarrio and his co-defendants are not the first Jan. 6 defendants to be sentenced for seditious conspiracy. Stewart Rhodes, the founder of the far-right group known as the Oath Keepers, was sentenced to 18 years in prison after a jury found him guilty of the crime. The sentence was lower than the 25 years recommended by prosecutors.
The Justice Department has said it plans to appeal that sentence, and many Oath Keepers defendants, including Rhodes, are appealing their convictions.
- In:
- Proud Boys
veryGood! (539)
Related
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- In House Bill, Clean Energy on the GOP Chopping Block 13 Times
- NFL record projections 2023: Which teams will lead the way to Super Bowl 58?
- Fugitive Carlos Ghosn files $1 billion lawsuit against Nissan
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- What’s an Electric Car Champion Doing in Romney’s Inner Circle?
- Kim Zolciak’s Daughters Send Her Birthday Love Amid Kroy Biermann Divorce
- Father's Day 2023 Gift Guide: The 11 Must-Haves for Every Kind of Dad
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Edgy or insensitive? The Paralympics TikTok account sparks a debate
Ranking
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- James Ray III, lawyer convicted of murdering girlfriend, dies while awaiting sentencing
- Fuzzy Math: How Do You Calculate Emissions From a Storage Tank When The Numbers Don’t Add Up?
- A woman almost lost thousands to scammers after her email was hacked. How can you protect yourself?
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Knoxville has only one Black-owned radio station. The FCC is threatening its license.
- Toddlers and Tiaras' Eden Wood Is All Grown Up Graduating High School As Valedictorian
- North Dakota's governor has signed a law banning nearly all abortions
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Why Nick Jonas’ Performance With Kelsea Ballerini Caused Him to Go to Therapy
Major Corporations Quietly Reducing Emissions—and Saving Money
Would you like to live beyond 100? No, some Japanese say
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Diversity in medicine can save lives. Here's why there aren't more doctors of color
Alfonso Ribeiro's Wife Shares Health Update on 4-Year-Old Daughter After Emergency Surgery
Florida's abortion laws protect a pregnant person's life, but not for mental health